Blog

Let’s Fix It: Fuel Growth with Energy Independence

I really liked this post from Robert Nardelli, so I’m re-posting it. Very wise words from the Founder, Chairman & CEO at XLR-8. 

Kudos to the energy entrepreneurs and innovators! Their efforts over the past decades have been heroic, given the challenges they face. Having been a part of the energy industry as president and CEO of GE Power Systems and now working in private equity, I have had the opportunity to invest in and work directly with these innovators, and I’ve seen just what they can do – and how their contributions can help our country move toward energy independence.

It’s a goal that didn’t seem attainable a few years back.

Many may not recall the last true “energy crisis,” but for me, it’s a very vivid memory. Back in 1973, I was working as a young manufacturing engineer at GE, and I saw how the U.S. was nearly crippled by an Arab oil embargo. At the time, the U.S. was importing 35 percent of its oil, and President Richard Nixon proclaimed that the country should work toward energy independence. Nixon’s goal seemed lofty, but attainable.

Instead of learning from the oil crisis we faced that year, though, we actually boosted our imports. Daniel Yergin, a Pulitzer Prize-winning author and co-founder and chairman of the Cambridge Energy Research Associates (CERA), reports in Politico magazine that by 2005, the U.S. was importing 60 percent of its oil, even as our oil production and natural gas output went down.

Although intentions have been good in the past, only through the dedication and perseverance of industry leaders and innovators can our country truly become energy independent. Today, our oil imports have fallen to Nixon-era levels, thanks to increased production, improvements in automobile efficiency, and numerous energy-saving inventions – and the goal once again is within reach.

Attaining true energy independence should be one of our nation’s top priorities and – if given the chance – it’s the one thing I’d fix. Here’s why:

It’s a major job creator. The Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI) estimated in 2013 that the “clean” energy industry alone accounted for about a million jobs in our country. In 2012, energy production supported 2.1 million jobs, and global information company IHS believes that figure will rise to 3.3 million jobs by 2020. Washington, D.C. non-profit The Solar Foundation estimated that solar jobs increased nearly 20 percent between 2012 and 2013 — 10 times the national average job growth rate. The hiring pace, too, was 50 percent higher than it had been the year before.

Energy efficiency is another job-creating vehicle. About 380,000 people were estimated to be employed in that space in 2008, according to the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. The United States could create 1.3 to 1.9 million jobs by 2050 through the deployment of energy efficient technologies, says the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE).

It brings in tax revenues. Clearly one of the biggest incremental contributors to our tax revenues, and therefore to debt reduction, the country’s energy boom accounted for an additional $74 billion in federal and state coffers in 2012, according to the IHS.

It’s just good for business. GasBuddy.com predicts that gas prices will drop in November to under $3 a gallon – the lowest they’ve been in four years. The reason: more U.S. production and less demand, brought about in part by more efficient vehicles. Translate those declining gas prices to dollars that the average family will be able to use toward other goods and services. The resulting GDP growth will help bring down the percentage of those who are underemployed while increasing overall employment levels.

It combats global insecurity. At a time when there is so much uncertainty on a global basis, being dependent on other nations for what is essentially the lifeblood of our economy is unwise. Additionally, we can use our new-found energy independence to garner political support and gain allies, thanks to our ability to export oil and gas to countries that face embargo threats.

So how do we achieve this not-so-lofty goal?

First, don’t get too married to one fuel source. Each has its pros and cons – and deserves open and honest debate by our key scientists and experts. That debate must focus on our nation’s common objective of energy independence. Ideally, the solution will be derived by selecting the optimal combination of all fuel choices and generation options. A mix of solutions that includes oil & gas and renewables, as well as increased efficiencies, can contribute to that goal and, in the process, even improve the air we breathe.

Second, reward the entrepreneurs. Although quite fragmented, this group should be recognized and rewarded as they drive technology and innovation that can help us achieve our energy goals. One such innovation is horizontal drilling, which multiplies well recovery rates – meaning more money for mineral owners as well as increased tax revenues, Daniel Blackmon writes in Forbes. Since one horizontal well can replace numerous vertical wells, land and water can be saved and emissions decreased.

Yes, funding our innovators can lead to the next big break-through. Let’s applaud and recognize this industry for what it has accomplished. And let’s encourage it through policy and practice to continue the quest toward achieving true energy independence on a reliable, predictable and profitable basis for all – the country, the industry, and the consumer.

Energy independence can be a game changer – creating jobs, reducing our deficit, bringing in tax revenues, and reducing our imports. Bravo to the energy entrepreneurs and innovators, who will help us fuel our own growth!

High Performers vs. Workaholics: 7 Subtle Differences

I loved this post from Jullien Gordon so I’m re-posting it. All credit to him, all very true. 

I’m a recovering workaholic.

Over the past year, I’ve been reading, researching, and conducting experiments on myself to understand the difference between high performers and workaholics. I believe that there are healthier ways for us to work without sacrificing our values, the people we value, or the value we create but we, as a society, mistake workaholism for high performance, but they are two distinct ways of working.

High performance and workaholism look the same on the outside. They both look like hard work. The BIG DIFFERENCE is how the individual feels on the inside about who they are in relationships to their work.

A high performer works hard in healthy sustainable ways and feels happy and inspired.

A workaholic works hard in unhealthy unsustainable ways and feels unhappy and burned out.

1. Doing Business vs. Being Busy

A high performer’s #1 goal is to do business. The only thing that matters to them are results. If they can’t see a way to create value in the moment, they facilitate or strategize instead. They know that like the economy, business comes in waves, therefore, they get ready during the dips so they can capitalize during the upswings.

A workaholics’ #1 goal is to be busy. Workaholics fill any space in time with busy work because they feel insecure doing nothing. The insecurity comes from not knowing their value. They believe that the busier they are, the more important they must be. As a result, they find a way to be busy even when it’s not busy season instead of periodically hibernating throughout the days, weeks, months, quarters, and year for when the highs come.

2. Knows What’s Enough vs. Never Enough

A high perform knows what is enough. Whether we win by 1 point or 50 points, it doesn’t matter. A win is a win. High performers see more in the areas that matters, but they know what enough is in the areas that don’t matter so much. This comes from having a clear definition of success.

A workaholic doesn’t know what enough is. I’m not good enough. This isn’t good enough. I don’t have enough time. I don’t have enough support. They are always focused on more and seeing to maximize everything because they don’t really know what success means to them.

3. 100% At The Right Time vs. 110% All Of The Time

A high performer knows when to turn it up. When their number is called, they give everything they have. They don’t buy into the illusion of 110%. They know that 110% is unsustainable. Instead they focus on increasing their capacity so that their 100% is better than the competition’s 110%.

A workaholic thinks “turn down for what?” They hustle, grind, and go H.A.M. all of the time. They have difficulty prioritizing what’s important, therefore, everything is important in their mind.

4. Knows Their Value vs. Allows Others To Determine Value

A high performer knows their self-worth and can thus work with a sense a freedom. This comes from doing periodic self-evaluation of their performance so that they can constant improve. They create their own feedback loops rather than waiting on feedback from others.

A workaholic relies on external validation from their boss, colleagues, and clients and thus works with a sense of fear. They wait for external evaluations such as mid-year or annual reviews done by others to understand how well they are doing.

5. Proactive/Intentional vs. Reactive/Unintentional

A high performer is proactive about their time and work. They design their day and anchor the most meaningful and important things in time first, and then they allow fires and other unplanned events to fill in the rest of their day. They don’t allow distractions to deter their strategy.

A workaholic is reactive about their time and work. They allow other people to choose how their time gets spent working by reacting to emails, fires, unplanned events, and other distractions that arise throughout the day. If and when all of the minutia get address, they try to do what’s most meaningful.

6. Focus On What I Control vs. What I Can’t

A high performer focuses on their effort—inputs and outputs. Only the individual knows if they gave the task at hand their best. They judge themselves against their best self as opposed to others.

A workaholic focuses on the outcome and their income. Even when you think you do your best, the outcome that we occurs and the income that is derived from it is not fully in our control. Their desire to compare leads them to judge themselves using common metrics of success which aren’t always directly correlated to effort.

7. Put Self First vs. Second

A high performer puts themselves first because they know that by doing so, it allows them to serve others at a higher level. At times it appears to be selfish, but it’s actually selfless because they want to give first-class service to those they work with and for.

A workaholics puts others before themselves. This appears to be selfless, but it’s not sustainable. When we constantly give more than we have and never take time to replenish our source, we end up depleted. This behaviors is also driven by the good intention of service, but desire to be needed and be the hero counters that intention.

I hope this has helped you understand the fine line between workaholics and high performance and determine where you are so that you can shift your approach to the great work you do daily.

Wishing you more happy hours,

Jullien Gordon
www.julliengordon.com

Renewable industry calls for next government to make series of commitments

A very interesting article by Charlotte Malone from Blue and Green Tomorrow

Tuesday, September 9th, 2014

Trade bodies from the renewable energy industry have joined together to call for political parties to commit to clean energy ahead of next year’s general election. The group has launched six ‘key tests’ in a renewable manifesto statement and campaign hosted by Action for Renewables.

The group of renewable energy trade bodies include the Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Association, the British Hydropower Association, the British Photovoltaic Association, the Renewable Energy Association, Renewable UK, Scottish Renewables and the Solar Trade Association.

Currently renewables provide 15% of the UK’s power and this figure is expected to increase to almost a third by the end of the decade. However, in order to achieve this the coalition of trade bodies wants the next government to commit to the industry in order to provide it with the consistency needed for growth.

Commenting on the campaign, Tony Juniper, chair of Action for Renewables, said, “The renewable energy bodies have come together with clear and simple propositions.

“We need consistent and strong backing for renewable energy, not only to cut carbon emissions and tackle climate change, but also to harness the opportunities for growth and jobs and reduce our reliance on dirty fossil fuel imports from insecure parts of the world.”

The six ‘key tests’ the manifesto has set out for the next government includes supporting the Climate Change Act, setting a new renewables target for 2030 of 30% of UK energy and backing the Independent Committee on Climate Change’s recommendation to set a binding target for low carbon electricity by 2030.

The group also wants to see reform in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme and the government funding the Renewable Heat Incentive past 2016. The final test is to boost the UK’s Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation to reach the 10% renewable energy target for transport by 2020.

The group is also calling on voters to become involved in the campaign by contacting party leaders and asking them to support the manifesto. Juniper added that without political backing renewable technologies cannot flourish.